list_sessions
View all currently active pseudo-terminal sessions. Use this to monitor ongoing shell commands and REPL interactions.
Instructions
List all active PTY sessions.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
View all currently active pseudo-terminal sessions. Use this to monitor ongoing shell commands and REPL interactions.
List all active PTY sessions.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description is minimal. It does not disclose return format, side effects, or any behavioral traits beyond listing sessions. More detail could help the agent understand what to expect.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. It is efficiently front-loaded and concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is sufficient for a basic understanding. However, it lacks details on return format and any behavioral context, which would improve completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are zero parameters, and the schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter semantics, which is acceptable since no parameters exist. Score reflects baseline for zero parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists all active PTY sessions, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings which focus on buffers, commands, keys, etc.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context but no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or any exclusions. For a simple list tool, this is adequate but lacks explicit usage direction.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/brkhrdt/pty-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server