scraping_browser_go_forward

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already supply the safety profile (destructiveHint=true), lowering the bar, but the description adds nothing beyond that: no mention of requiring an active browser session, behavior when no forward history exists, or side effects. It is essentially a restatement of the title.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short, front-loaded sentence with zero padding. It is efficient, though arguably under-specified rather than richly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter navigation tool with an existing annotation coverage and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It omits session/prerequisite context and what a no-op (no forward history) looks like, so it is complete only barely.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so per the scoring baseline a 4 applies; there are no parameter semantics to clarify and the schema is empty with additionalProperties disabled.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Go forward') tied to browser page navigation, which an agent can map to the forward-history action. It implicitly differs from sibling scraping_browser_go_back, though it never names it explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the self-explanatory nature of 'go forward' and its obvious pairing with go_back, but there is no explicit statement of when to use this versus scraping_browser_navigate or go_back, nor any preconditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.