deploy_site
Deploy a site to a server by providing the server ID and site ID.
Instructions
Deploy a site
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| siteId | Yes | The ID of the site | |
| serverId | Yes | The ID of the server |
Deploy a site to a server by providing the server ID and site ID.
Deploy a site
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| siteId | Yes | The ID of the site | |
| serverId | Yes | The ID of the server |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'deploy', implying mutation, but provides no details on reversibility, permissions, rate limits, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely short (one sentence), but under-specification is not conciseness. It lacks necessary detail, making it unhelpful.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, no annotations, and minimal description. For a deployment action, it should explain prerequisites, what happens during deployment, and expected outcomes.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with parameter descriptions, so baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Deploy a site' is a verb+resource but essentially restates the tool name without adding specificity. It does not distinguish this tool from siblings like 'reset_deployment_state' or 'toggle_quick_deploy'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Among siblings, there are other deployment-related tools, but the description provides no context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bretterer/forge-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server