Scored across 31 tools
Tools span distinct domains (IDE editing, build/run, on-disk file tooling, docs, logs), and overlapping clusters like get_code/set_code/edit_code/set_selected_text are carefully disambiguated by descriptions (whole-item vs. selection vs. targeted substring edit). A few pairs still require reading: run_project vs agentic_run, get_current_location vs get_project_info, and constant_value/property_value vs get_item_description all touch adjacent concepts.
Most names follow a verb_noun pattern (get_code, set_code, edit_code, create_project_item, list_project_items, lint_project_file, search_docs). Deviations like constant_value, property_value and debug_control use noun phrases, though they remain readable and predictable given the get/set dual semantics.
31 tools is at the heavy end and exceeds the comfortable 3-15 band; several could be merged (constant_value/property_value/get_item_description, run_project/agentic_run). However, the surface genuinely spans IDE automation, code editing, file linting/scaffolding, documentation lookup and logging, and no tool appears purely trivial.
Coverage is broad: read/write/edit code, item creation, declarations, constants/properties, build, run, debug stepping, save/revert, on-disk scaffolding and linting, docs search and logs. The notable gap is item deletion (explicitly impossible via IDE scripting, with a documented workaround), which is a minor rather than blocking hole.