A
licenseNot graded
qualityA
maintenanceEnables AI agents to generate professional cloud architecture diagrams directly from Terraform code, supporting AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure.
1,628
AGPL 3.0
byaml-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to byaml-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables LLMs to model, validate, and analyze multi-cloud infrastructure as a typed graph, with tools for IaC import/export, cost estimation, and architecture review.534 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI to analyze, query, and manage a graph-based representation of software architecture for impact analysis, dependency tracking, and design.209 npm1AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceExtracts deterministic architecture maps from codebases for AI agents, enabling queries about blast radius, routes, security findings, and production readiness without sending code anywhere.6MIT
Synlake MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover, evaluate, and provision cloud infrastructure across AWS, GCP, and Azure with cross-cloud normalization, cost comparisons, and deployable execution kits.58 npmMIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceTransforms codebases into structural knowledge graphs for AI agents and developers, providing precise architectural awareness and dependency mapping.54MIT
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 8 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct concern: schema retrieval, graph construction from three different input sources, graph validation, downstream impact analysis, cost aggregation, and remediation planning. No two tools overlap in purpose, making selection unambiguous.
Naming Consistency4/5
Names follow snake_case and mostly verb_noun (validate_graph, cost_summary, remediation_plan), with graph_from_* indicating source. Minor deviations like schema_latest and blast_radius are still clear and consistent in style, so no confusion arises.
Tool Count5/5
With 8 tools, the surface is well-scoped for an architecture analysis server. Each tool contributes to a clear workflow (create graph, validate, analyze, remediate), and the count is within the ideal range for coherence.
Completeness4/5
The set covers graph generation from multiple sources, validation, blast radius, cost, and remediation. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no graph diff or editing), but the core lifecycle for analysis is complete and no dead ends are apparent.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues