Brazilayer MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Brazilayer MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for Brazilian company and public procurement data, enabling CNPJ lookup, company search, tender resolution, and more via paid USDC-based API calls.1578 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP Server for accessing 36 Brazilian public data sources and 1 agent, enabling AI agents to query government data on economy, legislation, transparency, judiciary, elections, environment, health, and more.6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query real-time, audited Brazilian public data on fuel and LPG prices, regulated medicine ceilings and Farmácia Popular eligibility, and basic food basket/cost-of-living indicators across all 27 states via MCP tools, prompts, and resources.11MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceDados brasileiros reais (CNPJ, CEP, taxas, CPF) via MCP, pagos em USDC por chamada (x402).572 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query Brazilian public data through MCP tools: resolve postal codes to addresses, validate and look up company registry records, list national holidays, count business days between dates, and retrieve official PTAX exchange rates. Validation and upstream failures are returned as recoverable tool errors rather than crashes, so models can explain or retry problems in conversation.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that connects AI agents to 28 Brazilian public APIs, providing tools to query government data on economy, legislation, transparency, judiciary, elections, environment, health, and more.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 46 tools
Most tools target clearly distinct resources and actions, and domain prefixes (desmatamento_, cnpj_, mercado_, commodities_, fundos_, tributos_, licitacoes_) help separate them. However, there is meaningful overlap between individual lookups and bundles such as cnpj_consultar_empresa_completo vs empresa_enriquecer, and the many *_obter_amostra tools could be confused with paid counterparts at a glance.
Names are consistently snake_case and generally follow a domain-first pattern, which makes the catalog readable. Still, action vocabulary is mixed in Portuguese (consultar, obter, buscar, listar, verificar) and sometimes noun-only (ranking, fluxos, fogo), and two tools use English names (trust_check, skill_check).
At 46 tools, the server is well above the typical 3-15 range and even above the 16-25 borderline band. The breadth across ten-plus data domains explains some of the count, but the surface feels large and catalog-like rather than tightly scoped.
The tool set covers a wide range of Brazilian due-diligence and market-data workflows, including free samples, paid lookups, and bundled packages, which reduces dead ends. Minor gaps remain because some domains have only high-level or aggregate views rather than exhaustive detail, but core workflows are represented.