domain-create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description offers no behavioral details beyond the HTTP method. With annotations only providing 'openWorldHint: true', the agent is left uninformed about what side effects occur (e.g., resource creation, validation, persistence) or prerequisites.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short but lacks substance. Conciseness should retain usefulness; here it is under-specified, effectively wasting the opportunity to inform the agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (15 parameters, no schema descriptions, no output schema, and many sibling tools), the description is grossly incomplete. It fails to clarify what the tool does, what constitutes valid input, or what the outcome is.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, and the tool description adds no parameter explanations. With 15 parameters, the agent cannot understand the purpose of each field like host, path, certificateType, etc. from the description alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'POST /domain.create' is a tautology, merely restating the tool name and HTTP method. It fails to communicate that the tool creates a new domain resource or what a domain represents.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus related sibling tools like domain-update, domain-delete, or domain-byApplicationId. The description lacks any context for decision-making.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.