type_text
Types text into the frontmost app via simulated keystrokes.
Instructions
Type text using the keyboard. The frontmost app receives the input.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | Yes | Text to type |
Types text into the frontmost app via simulated keystrokes.
Type text using the keyboard. The frontmost app receives the input.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | Yes | Text to type |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Lacks annotations, so description must carry behavioral information. It mentions 'frontmost app receives input' but omits details about special characters, latency, or error handling.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences, front-loaded with the core action, no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is mostly complete, though could mention return behavior or side effects.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and description adds no new meaning beyond the schema's 'Text to type' description. Baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states 'Type text using the keyboard' with a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes from sibling tools like key_press which handles key combos.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like key_press or click_ui_element. Agent must infer from name and description alone.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bradthebeeble/mcp-macos-cua'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server