HexForge Gateway
Related Servers
Alternatives to HexForge Gateway
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for analyzing Android APK, DEX, or JAR files via a headless jadx engine, enabling LLM agents to query decompiled code, symbols, call graphs, and more.2GPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceFully automated MCP server built to communicate with JADX-AI-MCP Plugin to analyze Android APKs using LLMs like Claude — uncover vulnerabilities, parse manifests, and reverse engineer effortlessly.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that integrates with Apktool to provide live reverse engineering support for Android applications using Claude and other LLMs through the Model Context Protocol.16661Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA minimal, secure MCP server for AI-assisted mobile development, enabling build, install, interact, and inspect Android/iOS apps.3322 npm11Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides AI agents with a unified MCP interface for Android APK reverse engineering, metadata analysis, Smali/resource editing, rebuilding, signing, verification, and ADB device testing.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that connects to a custom JADX fork (JADX-AI) and enables local LLMs to interact with decompiled Android app code for live reverse engineering assistance.32794Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 19 tools
Every tool targets a distinct action and resource: decode vs decompile are clearly differentiated by rebuildability, adb_* tools each handle a specific adb operation, and frida_trace vs frida_list_processes cover different dynamic analysis aspects. No two tools appear to do the same thing.
The majority of tools follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern (decode_apk, build_apk, scan_secrets). Minor deviations like 'adb_devices' and 'chat_with_workspace' break the pure verb_noun pattern but are still understandable and predictable given the tool's domain.
With 19 tools, this is slightly on the high side of the ideal range, but each tool serves a distinct purpose in the APK analysis and dynamic instrumentation workflow. The count is justified by the breadth of static analysis, file management, ADB, and Frida capabilities, and none feel redundant.
The tool surface covers the full lifecycle of APK analysis: static decoding/decompiling, rebuilding, packer identification, secret scanning, code search, dynamic analysis via ADB and Frida, plus workspace and knowledge management. Minor gaps like a signing tool (explicitly noted as external) and perhaps a network capture tool prevent a perfect score, but the core workflows are well supported.