Skip to main content
Glama
bountyoperator

bounty-operator

Official
by bountyoperator
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to bounty-operator

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • agent-review

      yibei-wz
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local-first, auditable code review MCP server that freezes Git changes, creates immutable ReviewBundles, provides role-isolated contexts for correctness, security, architecture, and test reviewers, validates structured findings, and generates deterministic JSON/Markdown reports.
      3 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • leveret

      leveret-dev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP engine for private code reviews, providing deterministic static analysis and AST-level search over diffs, with findings passed to a review agent of your choice.
      5
      2
      AGPL 3.0

    • Moreno.Jev

      MorenoLand
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable coding agents to obtain structured TypeSafe Jev decisions on code, diffs, debugging hypotheses, test failures, and bug reports through six review and triage tools. It returns categorized verdicts, severities, and probabilities rather than explanations or patches, leaving verification to the connected agent.
      6
      MIT

    • gitl

      akomyagin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      AI code reviews and git activity digests with machine-readable risk scoring, available as an MCP server for use within an agent session.
      1
      MIT

    • Co-dev review MCP

      MohamedAmineBoufares
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an MCP-capable assistant to review GitLab merge requests, GitHub pull requests, and pre-push local branches against ticket requirements, domain rubrics, compiler/lint pre-passes, blast-radius analysis, and SonarQube findings, and to draft inline comments or follow-up tasks in the user's chosen language. Nothing reaches a remote host until a human approves the exact content in an interactive terminal.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct role in the review lifecycle: discovery (list_profiles), local prep (prepare_review), hosted execution (run_review), planning (run_gauntlet_plan), post-processing (build_packet), and account status (account). The one potential overlap is prepare_review vs run_review, but descriptions clearly separate 'your own model' from 'hosted provider/model,' so confusion is limited.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most names follow a verb_noun pattern (list_profiles, prepare_review, run_gauntlet_plan, build_packet, run_review). The bare noun 'account' is the sole deviation, but overall the convention is largely predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a review-pipeline server, with each tool mapping to a clear pipeline stage (discover, prepare, plan, execute, account, packet). Nothing feels redundant or missing at the count level.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers discovery, preparation, planning, hosted execution, account/allowance checks, and evidence packet assembly, which is a coherent end-to-end workflow. Minor gaps exist—no explicit tool to list prior reviews or manage/rotate tokens—but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources