Skip to main content
Glama
bountyoperator

bounty-operator

Official
by bountyoperator
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to bounty-operator

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • github-review-queue-mcp

      alijahak
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Lets MCP clients such as Claude or ChatGPT find the pull requests waiting on your review, read their details and changed files, check CI status, post comments, and submit approve, request-changes, or comment reviews. It runs locally over stdio with a personal token or as a remote server with its own OAuth 2.1 authorization server (PKCE, dynamic client registration, per-client consent, and refresh-token rotation) so GitHub is only used to sign the user in.
      6
      MIT

    • agent-review

      yibei-wz
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local-first, auditable code review MCP server that freezes Git changes, creates immutable ReviewBundles, provides role-isolated contexts for correctness, security, architecture, and test reviewers, validates structured findings, and generates deterministic JSON/Markdown reports.
      3 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • emo-cyber-agent

      SE-Emam
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible agent hosts to delegate governed, read-only security audits and reviews of code, applications, agents, prompts, MCP configurations, and cloud environments through evidence-first findings and stable schemas.
      242 PyPI
      2
      Apache 2.0

    • leveret

      leveret-dev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP engine for private code reviews, providing deterministic static analysis and AST-level search over diffs, with findings passed to a review agent of your choice.
      5
      2
      AGPL 3.0

    • Moreno.Jev

      MorenoLand
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable coding agents to obtain structured TypeSafe Jev decisions on code, diffs, debugging hypotheses, test failures, and bug reports through six review and triage tools. It returns categorized verdicts, severities, and probabilities rather than explanations or patches, leaving verification to the connected agent.
      6
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    run_review and prepare_review both concern review execution but are clearly split by hosted versus own-model workflows, while build_packet and run_gauntlet_plan serve adjacent but distinct orchestration roles. Most tools are distinguishable from descriptions, though an agent must read carefully to choose the correct review path.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Five of six tools follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern, such as run_review and build_packet. The bare noun 'account' is the one deviation, but the overall naming remains predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools map cleanly to the workflow: profile discovery, account check, preparation, hosted execution, packet building, and gauntlet planning. No tool appears redundant, and the count is well-scoped for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers hosted and own-model review paths, profile discovery, packet construction, allowance checking, and gauntlet planning. Minor gaps remain around final submission/finalization or checking review status, but core review workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources