Skip to main content
Glama
bouncelens

BounceLens Email Check

Official
by bouncelens
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to BounceLens Email Check

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • email-validator-api

      lazymac2x
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Comprehensive email validation MCP server that checks syntax, MX records, disposable domains, role-based accounts, SPF/DKIM, typo suggestions, and risk scoring.
      -

    • email-verify

      Baneado98
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables real-time email verification via MCP tools, checking syntax, MX, disposable domains, and optional SMTP probe to determine deliverability with a VALID/RISKY/INVALID verdict.
      2
      9 npm
      MIT

    • kluno-verify-mcp

      Kuldip99123
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Code or Claude Desktop to verify whether email addresses are deliverable, returning status, sub-status, reason, confidence, and metadata.
      1
      12 npm
      ISC

    • InboxValid MCP Server

      aayusharmaaa
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables email address verification through a single MCP tool, returning whether an address is valid, invalid, or risky.
      1
      -

    • InboxValid MCP Server

      siddreddy07
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides email verification as an MCP tool, checking format, disposable domains, and mail server availability with structured results.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    check_email and check_emails have clearly distinct purposes: one validates a single address, the other validates up to 500 in a batch. The descriptions explicitly differentiate them, and there is no functional overlap that would cause misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (check_email, check_emails), with the plural form clearly indicating the batch operation. The naming is predictable and easy to infer.

    Tool Count4/5

    Two tools is slightly below the typical 3-15 range, but the server's narrow purpose (email validation) is well-covered by a single and a bulk tool. Each tool earns its place, and adding more would likely be redundant.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface fully covers the stated domain: single and bulk email validation with detailed statuses, typo suggestions, and duplicate handling. There are no obvious missing operations for the core task, and the limitation on mailbox checking is clearly disclosed.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources