Logitech Sync MCP

Overview Schema Related Servers Score Discussions

Search Logitech Sync inventory

logitech_sync_search_inventory

Read-onlyIdempotent

Search across place and device inventory using text queries and filters for type, status, and health. Returns matching objects with pagination.

Instructions

Search across place and device inventory as one agent-oriented workflow.

    This tool follows bounded pagination and dynamically requests identity, location, contract,
    network, version, and health fields needed for useful matches. Use an exact id/serial for a
    specific entity or partial text for discovery. It does not modify inventory.

    Returns matching place/device objects plus complete/partial pagination metadata. Increase
    ``max_pages`` only when ``next_continuation`` shows the API scan was partial. When
    ``nextResultOffset`` is returned, repeat the same filters with that ``result_offset``.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`desks`	No	Search desks.
`query`	Yes	Case-insensitive text matched across ids, names, serials, versions, groups, locations, contracts, licenses, IPs, MACs, and hostnames.
`rooms`	No	Search rooms.
`target`	No	Search places, devices, or both.	any
`max_pages`	No	Maximum API pages followed for this search.
`page_size`	No	API page size; 1000 minimizes quota usage.
`place_type`	No	Optional Room or Desk filter.
`unlicensed`	No	Include unlicensed places.
`device_type`	No	Optional Logitech, Computer, or Generic device filter.
`max_results`	No	Maximum matching entities returned.
`detail_level`	No	concise or detailed match payloads.	concise
`device_status`	No	Optional Offline, Online, or InUse filter for device matches.
`health_status`	No	Optional NoIssues, Warning, or Error filter for device matches.
`result_offset`	No	Local match offset; reuse nextResultOffset with identical filters.
`response_format`	No	Text view returned alongside structured content.	markdown

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`ok`	No
`data`	Yes
`meta`	No
`summary`	Yes

Tool Definition Quality

A4.4/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false. Description adds context about bounded pagination, dynamic field requests, and non-modification, which are consistent and go beyond annotations. No contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is concise, well-structured, and front-loaded with the main purpose. Every sentence adds value, and there is no redundancy. The pagination guidance is efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description covers core workflow, pagination handling, and non-destructive nature. With output schema present, return values need not be detailed. Could mention more about output structure but is sufficient for agent understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% coverage (all parameters described in schema). Description provides overall workflow context but does not add substantial per-parameter semantics beyond what schema already provides. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Search across place and device inventory as one agent-oriented workflow' and distinguishes from sibling tools like logitech_sync_list_places by specifying it searches both places and devices. The purpose is specific and actionable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description provides explicit guidance: 'Use an exact id/serial for a specific entity or partial text for discovery.' It also explains pagination behavior with max_pages and result_offset. However, it does not explicitly state when to use alternatives or when not to use this tool, so it is not a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an Intern
By Om-Shree-0709 on July 2, 2026.
Agent Identity
MCP Security
OAuth Delegation
Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)
By Om-Shree-0709 on June 30, 2026.
Agentic Ai
Prompt Injection
WebAssembly
Lightport: Open-Sourcing Glama's AI Gateway
By punkpeye on April 27, 2026.
OpenAI
open source

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bouchecousue/logitech-sync-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server