Crossref MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Crossref MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides access to the DBLP computer science bibliography database, allowing AI models to search publications, process citations, and generate accurate BibTeX entries.643MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server for searching and downloading academic papers from multiple free and public sources, enabling LLM-driven academic research workflows.57MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive Model Context Protocol server that provides AI assistants with direct access to Semantic Scholar's academic database, enabling advanced paper discovery, citation analysis, author research, and AI-powered recommendations.16-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server for scholarly tools, enabling AI assistants to interact with scholarly data and services via discoverable tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI agents to search, retrieve, and analyze academic papers from arXiv, supporting features like keyword search, paper details retrieval, content extraction, and paper analysis.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables natural language interaction with arXiv.org, allowing users to search, retrieve metadata, download PDFs, and load scholarly articles into LLM context.539MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: retrieving a paper by DOI, searching by author, and searching by title. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the appropriate tool based on the query.
The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern (getWorkByDOI, searchByAuthor, searchByTitle), with all tools using camelCase. However, the slight inconsistency in 'getWorkByDOI' (using 'Work' instead of 'Paper' or a more specific term) is a minor deviation from perfect alignment with the domain.
With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for a Crossref domain that typically involves broader operations like searching by keyword, year, or journal. While the tools cover basic retrieval and search, the count is borderline low for comprehensive scientific paper access.
The tool surface has significant gaps for a Crossref server. Missing operations include searching by keyword, year, or journal, as well as CRUD-like actions such as listing or filtering results. This incompleteness will likely cause agent failures when handling common academic queries.