Search Saxo Capabilities

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true, openWorldHint=true, which convey safe, read-only behavior. The description adds that it searches capabilities and examples, which is a modest addition. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is only two short sentences, each serving a purpose: stating what the tool does and when to use it. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and many sibling tools, the description should clarify what 'capabilities and examples' means (e.g., tool names, descriptions, arguments). It is vague on the format and scope of results, leaving the agent uncertain about what it will actually retrieve.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the input schema provides no descriptions for the two parameters (query, limit). The tool description does not describe them either, leaving the AI agent to infer meaning from parameter names alone. This is insufficient for a discoverability tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches the Saxo MCP server capabilities and examples, and explicitly positions it as a first-use discovery tool distinct from the many sibling tools that perform specific actions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Use this first when deciding which Saxo tool to call,' giving clear guidance on when to use it. It doesn't explicitly list when not to use it, but the context strongly implies it's for orientation before selecting other tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.