Get Kilango Workspace

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, openWorld, idempotent, and non-destructive hints. The description adds context about what the workspace reveals (read vs write, ADMIN scope), which is useful beyond the annotations. No contradiction. It doesn't over-disclose beyond what's useful.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, information-dense sentence plus a clear call-to-action. Zero wasted words. Front-loaded with action and resource, immediately followed by what it returns and when to use it.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, read-only metadata/discovery tool with rich annotations, this description fully covers purpose, use case, and expected output. No output schema exists, but it implies return contents (workspace, role/scopes). Nothing material is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Zero parameters, so baseline is 4 according to the rubric. Schema has no params to document, and the description doesn't need to add param semantics. The description's mention of role/scopes output is a nice forward-looking hint about what will be returned.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb 'get' + resource 'workspace', clearly states what it returns (bound workspace plus key role/scopes). Distinguishes itself as a discovery/context tool from siblings that all operate on portals, pages, or operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs to 'call this first to confirm which workspace and what capability you have.' This is strong when-to-use guidance and implies it's a prerequisite before other operations, especially distinguishing read vs write/ADMIN capability.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.