combell-mcp-boostu
Related Servers
Alternatives to combell-mcp-boostu
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage cPanel hosting accounts including DNS, email, databases, SSL, files, security, and more through natural language using cPanel's UAPI and API2.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables natural language management of 20i web hosting services, including domains, databases, email, WordPress, and more, through AI assistants like Claude and ChatGPT.9MIT
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables deploying sites, managing databases, and troubleshooting deployments on Hostwares from AI assistants.14-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage WHM hosting accounts and server administration tasks including account management, server stats, updates, SSL, backups, and email through a secure API.10-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Migadu email hosting services through natural language, including creating mailboxes, setting up aliases, configuring autoresponders, and handling bulk operations efficiently.3517 PyPI16MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Cloudways infrastructure, including servers, applications, monitoring, and security via the Cloudways API.-
TDQS
Scored across 74 tools
Every tool targets a distinct resource-action pair (e.g., mailboxes vs. mail zones, MySQL databases vs. users, SSL certificates vs. requests). Descriptions clearly differentiate similar-sounding tools like subsites vs. host headers, and FTP vs. SSH access. No two tools appear to perform the same operation.
All tools follow a consistent pattern: combell_<resource>_<action> with snake_case verbs like list, get, create, update, delete, set. Even subresources are nested predictably (e.g., combell_dns_records_create, combell_mail_zones_aliases_update). The only minor deviation is combell_ssh_keys_list_all vs combell_ssh_keys_list, but this is still clear.
With 74 tools, the server is severely over-scoped for an MCP server. While each tool is specific, the sheer volume makes discovery and selection difficult, and exceeds the typical range (3-15 tools) by a wide margin. The broad domain justifies some complexity, but this count is unwieldy.
The tool set covers comprehensive CRUD and lifecycle operations for domains, DNS, mail, MySQL, SSL, and hosting (Linux and Windows). Notable gaps include no direct update for mailbox quotas, no domain deletion, and limited Windows hosting management beyond list/get, but these are minor and do not block core workflows.