MCP Human Loop Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| evaluate_need_for_humanC | Evaluate if a task requires human intervention |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| evaluate_task | Evaluate if the current task needs human intervention |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined as evaluating the need for human intervention, making it distinct by default.
The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern (evaluate_need_for_human), which is consistent and predictable. Since there are no other tools, there is no inconsistency to assess.
A single tool is too few for a server intended to handle human-in-the-loop workflows, as it lacks operations for actually engaging humans (e.g., request_human, submit_feedback, cancel_request). This minimal set limits functionality and suggests an incomplete implementation.
The server's purpose implied by the tool name is to manage human intervention, but with only an evaluation tool, there are significant gaps. Missing are tools to request, handle, or finalize human interactions, making the surface severely incomplete for practical use.