deepseek_file_analysis

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full responsibility for disclosing behavior. It clearly states the file content is sent externally to DeepSeek and restricted to text, which are the primary behavioral traits. It does not mention return format or side effects, but the external transmission and text-only limitation are effectively communicated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence that immediately conveys the action, target, and key limitation. There is no redundant wording; every phrase carries value, making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool without an output schema or annotations, the description is somewhat sparse. It omits details about the response format, any prerequisites (e.g., API key configuration), and potential behavioral nuances like file size limits. While the core purpose is covered, a bit more context would make it fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds meaningful context beyond the schema by noting the API Key mode restriction (single text file) and the mode distinction between file_path and file_paths. This helps the agent choose the correct parameter and clarifies the 'text' constraint not present in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool reads file content and sends it to DeepSeek for analysis, with a specific verb (read/send), resource (file), and outcome (analysis). It stands apart from sibling chat/reasoning tools by focusing on file-based input, making its purpose unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly frames when to use the tool: for file analysis. It also notes a crucial constraint ('API Key mode: only supports a single text file'), which indirectly guides against using it for multiple files or binary formats in that mode. However, it does not name alternative tools for multi-file or web-mode scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.