stop_transport
Stop playback or recording in REAPER DAW to pause active audio sessions and control project transport during music production.
Instructions
Stop playback or recording.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Stop playback or recording in REAPER DAW to pause active audio sessions and control project transport during music production.
Stop playback or recording.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Discloses that it stops both playback and recording modes, but lacks side-effect details (cursor position behavior, auto-save) given no annotations exist.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise (4 words), front-loaded with action verb, no filler content.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Sufficient for a parameterless tool with no output schema, though could clarify transport state implications.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Zero parameters present; meets baseline expectation with no parameter explanation needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clear verb (stop) and targets (playback/recording), implicitly contrasts with play_project/start_recording siblings but lacks explicit differentiation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use versus alternatives or workflow context (e.g., after play_project/start_recording).
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bonfire-audio/reaper-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server