Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Swarmail

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    A coordination layer for coding agents that provides memorable identities, inbox/outbox messaging, searchable message history, and file lease management to prevent conflicts. Uses Git for human-auditable artifacts and SQLite for fast queries, enabling multiple agents to collaborate across projects without stepping on each other.
    41
    2,222
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI coding agent sessions working in the same project folder to discover one another, message each other, track status, and bid on owner-posted tasks over MCP. Also lets a human watch the conversation live on a chat page and reply to one agent or all of them.
    13
    428 PyPI
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI coding sessions across multiple agent CLIs to share one identity and inbox, hand off tasks, send encrypted files and conversation transcripts, publish living documents, and coordinate approvals through hooks and MCP tools.
    26 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables coding-agent sessions on the same machine to collaborate locally and durably by exchanging requests, replies, and task results through an authenticated loopback server with SQLite-backed storage, joined via CLI or an MCP stdio bridge. It also handles message delivery by priority and wait time, deduplicates idempotent sends, enforces task versioning, and preserves artifacts by content hash.
    30 npm
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables coding agents in different editors and MCP clients to share messages, project context, notes, task ownership, handoffs, and advisory file claims through a local SQLite-backed coordination server. Supports MCP stdio, MCP Streamable HTTP, a JSON HTTP API, and a local CLI for multi-project agent collaboration.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Lets separate coding-agent sessions coordinate through a shared, role-addressed mailbox instead of a human relaying every message, over a single local SQLite file or a hosted server with many isolated channels. Messages can be sent as tracked obligations that stay open until one side resolves and the other confirms, alongside threads, full-text search, work statuses, and an append-only versioned pin system where protected changes require recorded agreement from every declared role.
    41
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Provides a mail-like coordination layer for coding agents, enabling them to register identities, exchange messages through inbox/outbox, search threaded history, and declare advisory file reservations to prevent conflicts.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables agent sessions running under different coding harnesses on one machine to message each other and automatically wake idle receivers so they read the mail and reply. It stores all state as plain files under a home directory, with no daemon, network, or account required.
    439 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A local MCP server that lets parallel coding sessions in one repository coordinate, by registering agents with roles and statuses, delivering messages directly into their context, tracking tasks with dependencies, and claiming file paths to detect conflicts. It runs as a single loopback-only Python process backed by SQLite, with no accounts or external services.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables MCP-capable coding agents to discover peers, send messages, and read inboxes through a small self-hosted relay on your LAN or VPN, including role-based fan-out to teams. Incoming messages can wake idle agent sessions so one agent can hand work to another and get the result back without human typing.
    2
    4
    42 npm
    9
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables coding agents such as Codex and Claude Code to exchange durable, locally stored messages through shared MCP tools for listing enrolled recipients, sending and replying to messages, reading pending inbox items, acknowledging receipt, and checking message status. Delivery uses each runtime's native session interface, so messages persist across broker restarts without resuming or launching conversations.
    AGPL 3.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables Claude Code, Codex, and other coding-agent sessions on the same machine to message each other, exchange tracked tasks with owners and states, and coordinate through channels, broadcasts, and multi-session asks without typing into terminals. Messages are routed by what the receiver is doing — next tool call, end of turn, or a held-back digest — so a flood of traffic doesn't interrupt active work.
    14
    MIT

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 22 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools target clearly distinct resources and actions (send vs reply vs search, reserve vs renew vs release, register vs retire). The main overlaps are fetch_inbox vs fetch_session_inbox and mark_message_read vs acknowledge_message (and fetch_inbox's implicit read-marking), but the descriptions explicitly explain their boundaries, so misselection is unlikely.

Naming Consistency5/5

Nearly all tools follow a predictable snake_case verb_noun pattern (send_message, reply_message, register_agent, withdraw_message, file_reservation_paths, release_file_reservations). Minor deviations like whois and health_check are recognizable conventions rather than inconsistencies.

Tool Count4/5

22 tools sits at the heavy end, but the domain genuinely spans project setup, agent lifecycle, mail, delivery receipts, and file reservations, so most tools earn their place. A few (fetch_session_inbox vs fetch_inbox) could arguably be merged.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers project creation, agent registration/retirement/revival, full message lifecycle (send, reply, search, summarize, read, ack, withdraw, importance, receipts), and reservation lifecycle (reserve, renew, release), plus health check. No obvious blocking gaps, though project listing/teardown coverage is thin.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessResponsive