build_remove_from_whitelist_transaction

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits itself. It mentions the environment requirement, but does not explain whether this is a read-only transaction construction, what the output format is, or any side effects. For a 'build' operation, this is minimally transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loaded with a requirement flag. It is concise with no wasted words, though it could be slightly more informative without hurting conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description does not explain return values or side effects. It also lacks differentiation from very similar siblings (e.g., race whitelist removal), making it incomplete for an agent to understand when to use it effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already covers all three parameters with descriptions (100% coverage), so the baseline is 3. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema provides; it only restates the overall purpose.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Build transaction' and resource 'remove user from whitelist,' clearly stating its function. It distinguishes from the sibling 'build_add_to_whitelist_transaction' by the remove action, though it does not explicitly contrast with the race whitelist variant.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Only provides a prerequisite environment flag [REQUIRES BAOZI_LIVE=1], but gives no guidance on when to choose this over build_remove_from_race_whitelist_transaction or other alternatives. No exclusions or scenarios are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.