boldsign
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to boldsign
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server for OpsLevel12MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) Server for the mcp API.801MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for the Dropbox Sign API supporting signature requests, templates, teams, accounts, events, documents, signers, reports, bulk operations, and workflows.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA server implementation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) that provides REST API endpoints for managing and interacting with MCP resources.-

mcp-signwellofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceModel Context Protocol server that orchestrates SignWell's e-signature workflows — create, send, track, and manage documents and templates.1470MIT
Apideck MCPofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceModel Context Protocol server for the Apideck Unified API. Connect any MCP-compatible agent framework to 100+ accounting systems, HRIS platforms, file storage providers, and more through one integration. More information https://www.apideck.com/mcp-server422317MIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Most tools are clearly distinct by resource type (e.g., contact, document, template, team, user) and action (get vs. list). However, list_documents and list_team_documents have overlapping purposes that could cause confusion about which to use for team-related document listings, and send_document_from_template lacks a complementary create_document tool, creating a minor gap in the action set.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case, such as get_contact, list_contacts, revoke_document, and send_reminder_for_document_sign. The naming is predictable and uniform across all 14 tools, making it easy for agents to understand the pattern.
With 14 tools, the count is well-scoped for a document signing and management server like BoldSign. It covers key resources (contacts, documents, templates, teams, users) with appropriate CRUD-like operations, avoiding both bloat and thin coverage, which is typical for such domains.
The tool set provides good coverage for retrieving and listing resources, with specific actions like revoke_document and send_reminder_for_document_sign. However, there are notable gaps: no create_document (only send_document_from_template), no update or delete operations for contacts, templates, teams, or users, and no tools for managing document signatures or status changes beyond revocation, which could limit agent workflows.