Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
notion-mpm

notion-mpm

by bobmatnyc
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

create_comment

Create comments on Notion pages or reply to existing discussions. Requires insert comments permission.

Instructions

Add a comment to a Notion page. Requires 'insert comments' capability on the integration.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "text": "<text>"
    },
    "name": "create_comment"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
textYesComment text content
page_idNoPage UUID to add a top-level comment to
discussion_idNoExisting discussion ID to reply within

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.1

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It discloses the required permission but omits mutation effects, response behavior, and how page_id and discussion_id interact. This is inadequate for a write operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with no filler. The prerequisite statement is useful, and the description is appropriately compact.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 3 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description oversimplifies. It does not explain the relationship between page_id and discussion_id, nor what the API returns. This is incomplete for safe autonomous use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers 100% of parameters with clear descriptions, including text, page_id, and discussion_id. The description adds no additional parameter context, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Add a comment') and the target ('to a Notion page'), making the tool's function unambiguous. It inherently distinguishes from the read-only sibling get_comments through the verb 'Add'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a prerequisite (insert comments capability) but offers no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_comments or create_page. No exclusions or alternative references are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools