Skip to main content
Glama
Systemores Cloud MCP Server

Systemores Cloud MCP Server

by bobcar0

Related Servers

Alternatives to Systemores Cloud MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Turns any AI coding agent or MCP client into a governed DevOps engineer by exposing policy-enforced tools for Kubernetes, Docker, Jira, Git/PR, CI/CD, AWS, Terraform, and incident response, with approvals, audit logging, secret redaction, and rollback enforced outside the model.
      6
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible clients to access model registry, prediction logging, drift detection, bias/fairness auditing, compliance and governance queries, explanation generation, LLM/RAG monitoring, content safety, alert management, multi-agent workflow tracking, and performance metrics through 197 tools across 18 domains. Supports stdio and hosted Streamable HTTP transports, plus MCP Apps interactive audit cards.
      73 PyPI
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes governance, trust-scoring, compliance, guardrail, cost, drift, and supply-chain scanning tools and resources to any MCP client over stdio, Streamable HTTP, or legacy HTTP+SSE. It lets agents route every tool call through a deterministic five-way decision (allow, redact, require approval, deny, or quarantine) with hash-chained evidence, human approval workflows, and in-agent trust gates for LangChain, LangGraph, and Google ADK.
      30
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Governed MCP gateway that lets AI agents call tools with policy enforcement, prompt-injection screening, a kill-switch, and tamper-evident signed audit logs.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables real-time injection fuzzing, exfiltration canary detection, least-privilege tool sandboxing, and cryptographic audit proofs for untrusted prompts, RAG context, and agent actions over MCP.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct audit dimensions, but systemores_tool_integrity and systemores_audit_tool_integrity are easily confused: one evaluates prompt conditions for safe tool use while the other audits tool-definition schemas. systemores_measure_drag also overlaps with systemores_analyze_trace_telemetry on latency/drag detection, though descriptions help clarify the intended boundaries.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use the systemores_ prefix and snake_case, with most following a predictable verb_noun pattern such as stress_test_agent, evaluate_drift, and audit_agent_graph. Minor deviations exist: systemores_tool_integrity lacks an action verb and systemores_audit_turn_live places the qualifier awkwardly.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is well within the appropriate range for a comprehensive AI-agent auditing platform. Each tool maps to a major capability area such as behavioral stress, drift, bias, tool integrity, graph auditing, cohort generation, chaos injection, telemetry analysis, reporting, and live auditing.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full auditing lifecycle: behavioral testing, compliance checks, tool/graph integrity, synthetic cohort generation, chaos fault injection, telemetry analysis, formal reporting, and real-time circuit-breaker auditing. No obvious workflow dead ends are apparent for the stated domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues