Skip to main content
Glama

discuss_advisory_recommendations

Facilitate discussion and submit feedback on advisory recommendations by document ID. Refine strategic guidance and validate prioritization decisions.

Instructions

Facilitate discussion about advisory recommendations.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
document_idYes
recommendation_idsNo
user_feedbackNo
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description fails to disclose any behavioral traits, side effects, or what 'facilitating discussion' actually entails (e.g., notifications, storage, threading).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely brief (6 words) and front-loaded, but the brevity results from emptiness rather than efficient information density.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Incomplete given the lack of output schema and parameter descriptions; fails to explain return values or the advisory workflow context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage, yet the description adds no meaning for document_id, recommendation_ids, or user_feedback parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tautologically restates the tool name ('discuss' → 'facilitate discussion') without specifying mechanism or distinguishing from siblings like adopt_advisory_recommendations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides no guidance on when to use this versus adopting, analyzing, or retrieving advisory documents.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bobbyrgoldsmith/quarterback'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server