Skip to main content
Glama
boam79

gov-support-mcp

by boam79
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to gov-support-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Korea Housing MCP

      doorijaehyuk
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      This MCP server integrates South Korea's national law information, building registers from MOLIT, and KOSIS statistics for housing development research. It enables searching laws, retrieving building details, and accessing statistical data through natural language.
      -

    • TenderAI

      dbugom
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that automates government and enterprise tender workflows, including RFP parsing, proposal generation, and compliance tracking. It provides 18 specialized tools for technical and financial proposal assembly, partner coordination, and hybrid search across past proposal archives.
      1
      -

    • Youth Policy Navigator

      todayoneul
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that searches and matches youth policies and subsidies, checks eligibility conditions against user profiles, and returns detailed reasons (eligible/ineligible/needs_more_info) to drive an agentic question-answer loop.
      6
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, such as timeline building, eligibility checking, and document drafting. However, the three search tools (search_gov_support_bizinfo, search_gov_support_kstartup, search_gov_support_smes24) overlap in functionality with the integrated search tool (searchGovernmentSupport), which could cause confusion about when to use each. The descriptions clarify the differences, but the overlap is notable.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming conventions are mixed: some tools use camelCase (e.g., buildApplicationTimeline, checkEligibility), while others use snake_case (e.g., search_gov_support_bizinfo). This inconsistency reduces predictability, though the names remain readable. A few tools like manageAlertProfile and manageBenefitHistory follow a consistent verb_noun pattern, but the overall set lacks uniformity.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 12 tools, the count is well-suited for the server's purpose of supporting government grant applications. It covers a comprehensive range of tasks from search and eligibility checks to document drafting and history management, without feeling overloaded or sparse. Each tool appears to serve a specific, valuable function in the workflow.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete coverage for the domain of government support applications. It includes search, eligibility assessment, timeline planning, document drafting (e.g., business plans, settlement reports), checklist generation, and management of alerts and benefit histories. There are no obvious gaps; agents can handle end-to-end workflows from discovery to reporting.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources