Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to grok-computer-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to observe and control the user's live desktop by listing apps, reading accessibility trees, and performing clicks, typing, scrolling, dragging, and other input actions with per-action approvals and local audit archives.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agent-native desktop control by driving mouse, keyboard, and interface elements through accessibility-first semantic operations, with fallback to screen coordinates when accessibility cannot reach a target.
      30
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to observe and operate real desktops, mobile devices, and browser pages through screenshots, native accessibility trees, and web automation, including clicking, typing, hotkeys, and UI lookup across macOS, Linux, Windows, Android, and iOS.
      7
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to observe and control local browsers and desktop applications over MCP, including reading UI elements and differences, capturing images, and performing permitted clicks, typing, selections, scrolling, and multi-window operations.
      16
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to inspect and control allowlisted Windows applications using screenshots, mouse actions, Unicode keyboard input, UI Automation, and an Esc/F12 emergency stop.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables the model to observe and control the live desktop via accessibility trees and screenshots, performing actions like clicking, typing, scrolling, dragging, and setting values.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct action: observe for perception, wait_for for synchronization, locate for model-based grounding, and click/type_text/press_keys/scroll/drag for distinct input primitives. The observe/wait_for/locate trio is well-differentiated by intent and fallback role, so an agent can reliably pick the right one.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Mostly consistent lower_snake_case, with verb_noun forms (wait_for, type_text, press_keys) and clean single verbs (observe, click, scroll, drag, locate). The lone noun-style name 'apps' deviates slightly, but it is readable and unambiguous.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well-scoped for a GUI automation server, with each input modality (click, type, keys, scroll, drag) and perception path (observe, wait_for, locate) earning its place. No redundant or filler tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers perception, waiting, all major input primitives, app lifecycle, and a grounding fallback, which is strong for GUI control. Minor gaps remain, such as explicit double-click/hover, clipboard, or screenshot-only capture, though observe's som/screenshot modes partially mitigate this.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues