cfpb-complaints-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to cfpb-complaints-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables an AI assistant to query clean quarterly credit union and FDIC-insured bank financial data in plain language — lending, deposit mix, earnings, efficiency and peer benchmarking — through pre-built tools rather than raw SQL. Supports field lookup, institution profiles, metric time series, peer comparisons and quarterly income analysis across both sectors from 2018 to today.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceLets any MCP-speaking assistant look up SEC filings and fundamentals, 13F holdings, insider trades, BDC loan books, and U.S. government reference data from Treasury, FRED, FDIC, USAspending, USPTO and CFTC, with the source named on every answer. Most of its 29 tools run keyless against public sources, giving citations-backed answers without an account.51 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to browse the complete economic data catalog, search for series by keywords or tags, and retrieve observations with date ranges, frequency aggregation, and transformations. It provides access to more than 800,000 time series through three tools.331 npmAGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with natural language access to WRDS financial data for credit and equity analysis through 29 specialized tools. It enables users to query bond history, credit ratings, financial metrics, and syndicated loans using simple conversational prompts.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables financial research agents to query a read-only SQLite snapshot through six predefined, validated, sector-scoped tools for company snapshots, metric comparisons, sector benchmarks, and qualitative evidence search, returning sources, data dates, confidence, and limitations.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to company records, officers, ownership, corporate group structures, and available financial statements through six read-only tools with source provenance where available.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool has a recognizable niche: discovery (dataset_info, list_values, find_company), search (search_narratives, count_narratives), aggregation (complaint_counts, trend, company_profile, compare_companies), and retrieval (get_complaint). The main overlap is trend versus complaint_counts with group_by=month/quarter/year, and company_profile versus complaint_counts grouped by company; descriptions hint at the distinction but an agent could easily pick the wrong one.
All names are snake_case and readable, but the convention is mixed: verb-first (list_values, find_company, search_narratives, get_complaint, compare_companies, count_narratives) alongside noun-first (dataset_info, complaint_counts, trend, company_profile). Consistent casing keeps it predictable, but the verb/noun pattern is not uniform.
Ten tools is well matched to a dataset-query server: discovery, aggregation, search, and lookup each get a few focused tools with no filler. Nothing feels redundant enough to cut, and nothing important is squeezed into one overloaded tool.
The surface covers discovery, filtering vocabulary, aggregates, trends, company comparison, narrative search, and single-record lookup, which is a full lifecycle for this dataset. The notable gap is a way to page through raw complaint records by structured filters alone (search_narratives requires keywords and only covers narrated complaints), so browsing non-narrative complaints row-by-row is not possible.