Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
GATEKEEPER MCP

GATEKEEPER MCP

by blxnkl1
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to GATEKEEPER MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • inbin-gate

      inbin-gate

      yaotsakpo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables safe auto-approval for coding agents by gating file-changing actions to only execute when values were explicitly stated by an authorized developer or repository maintainer, refusing actions derived from agent-read text.
      1
      MIT

    • LeanGate

      lambdabypi
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to check whether a repository already provides the helper they are about to reimplement, surface bloat, missing error handling and security findings after each edit, and block task completion until blocking issues are fixed.
      7
      MIT

    • Proofrail

      armsteadj1
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to identify the least-proven claim in code after edits and receive a focused repair packet with exact source anchors, missing proof, reproducer, and a done condition, supporting iterative verify/fix loops.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Claude Code, inside the Godot 4 editorFlockbay puts an AI agent in the real Godot 4 editor: it writes GDScript, runs your game and fixes what breaks. Free, or bring your own Claude Code or Codex.flockbay.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    The server exposes exactly one tool, `pre_action_check`, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another tool. The purpose of the gate check is single and unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The single tool name `pre_action_check` is clear and snake_case, but it does not follow a verb-noun pattern and there is no set of tools to establish a broader naming convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only one tool, the server feels thin for the 'gatekeeper' domain, though the narrow purpose partially justifies the count. Auxiliary tools like policy lookup or reproduction validation are absent.

    Completeness4/5

    The core gatekeeping interaction is covered, but the surface lacks related operations such as querying gate rules or validating evidence formats, so coverage is functional but has minor gaps.

    Resources