Skip to main content
Glama
blurxy
by blurxy

py-exec-mcp

Run Python from an MCP client without a shell mangling your code.

CI PyPI Python License


The problem

Ask an agent to run a one-liner and it reaches for python -c "...". That code passes through three parsers before Python ever sees it — the shell, argv splitting, then Python itself — each with its own escaping rules.

python -c "print(f'he said \"hi {name}\"')"     # which layer eats which quote?

The failure mode is what makes this worth fixing: you usually get a wrong answer, not an error. A backslash vanishes, a quote closes early, an f-string silently becomes a literal — and the output looks plausible. So the agent retries with different escaping, or falls back to writing a temp file and running it, every single time.

Related MCP server: MCP Shell Server

The fix

Code arrives as a JSON string in the MCP tool call and is handed to the interpreter over stdin (python -). No shell. No argv. Nothing re-parses it.

Write the code exactly as it would appear in a .py file — nested quotes, f-strings, backslashes, regex, triple-quoted blocks — and it arrives verbatim.

Install

uvx py-exec-mcp          # no install
pip install py-exec-mcp  # or the usual way

Works on both MCP SDK majors — 2.x renamed FastMCP to MCPServer, and the server binds whichever one your environment has, so you are not forced to pin the SDK to match it.

Configure

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "py-exec": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["py-exec-mcp"]
    }
  }
}
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "py-exec": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["py-exec-mcp"],
      "env": { "PY_EXEC_CWD": "/absolute/path/to/your/project" }
    }
  }
}
python -m py_exec_mcp

The tool

run_python(code: str, timeout_s: float = 120) -> str

Returns stdout, stderr and the exit code as text:

42
--- stderr ---
warning: something
--- exit 0 ---

Four behaviours worth knowing, because each one is a thing that bit somebody:

behaviour

why

Truncation is announced

a silently clipped result is indistinguishable from a short one. You get --- stdout truncated: 12,043 more chars ---

A timeout still returns output

the runs that time out are the ones whose partial output matters most

The workdir is on PYTHONPATH

your project's own packages import without a sys.path dance

A missing interpreter says so

rather than failing as an empty result

Configuration

All optional. Everything works with none of them set.

variable

default

what it does

PY_EXEC_CWD

process cwd

directory code runs in, and the root added to PYTHONPATH

PY_EXEC_PYTHON

project venv, else sys.executable

interpreter to run code with

PY_EXEC_MAX_TIMEOUT

600

upper clamp on timeout_s

PY_EXEC_MAX_OUTPUT

30000

per-stream character cap before truncation

Interpreter resolution, in order: PY_EXEC_PYTHON.venv/Scripts/python.exe (Windows) or .venv/bin/python (everywhere else) under the working directory → the interpreter running the server. So in a project with a virtualenv, your dependencies are simply there.

⚠️ Security

This server executes arbitrary Python with the full privileges of the process that launched it. That is its entire purpose, and it is not sandboxed.

  • Code runs as your user, with your filesystem access and your network access.

  • The child process inherits the server's environment, so any secrets already exported into it are readable by executed code. If that matters, launch the server with a scrubbed environment.

  • Timeouts bound how long code runs. They bound nothing else.

Give it the same trust you would give a terminal. If you would not paste a script into your shell and hit enter, do not ask an agent to run it here. For untrusted code, run this inside a container or a VM — the isolation has to come from the layer underneath, because this server provides none.

Development

git clone https://github.com/blurxy/py-exec-mcp
cd py-exec-mcp
pip install -e ".[dev]"
pytest -q
ruff check . && ruff format --check .

Tests assert on what a caller reads — the returned string — never on "it did not crash". A test that asserts exit 0 has tested the process surviving, not the answer being right. CI runs the suite on Linux, macOS and Windows across Python 3.10–3.13, because cross-platform interpreter resolution is the part most likely to break, plus one job pinned to mcp<2 — the matrix always resolves the newest SDK, so without that job the 1.x import path would never be exercised.

Prior art

MCP has several Python-execution servers, and most target a different problem: sandboxing (containers, Pyodide, gVisor), or a persistent REPL/kernel where state survives between calls.

This one is deliberately narrow. It solves the quoting problem and nothing else — one tool, no sandbox, no session state, no notebook. If you need isolation, use a sandboxed server. If you need variables to persist across calls, use a Jupyter-backed one. If you keep losing an afternoon to escaping, this is the smaller thing.

Licence

Apache-2.0

Available Tools

1 tool
run_pythonA

Execute Python code and return its stdout, stderr and exit code.

The code is fed to the interpreter over STDIN, so it is never parsed by a shell or split into argv. Write it exactly as it would appear in a .py file: f-strings, nested quotes and backslashes all survive verbatim.

Runs in the working directory (PY_EXEC_CWD or cwd), which is also prepended to PYTHONPATH so the project's own packages import. timeout_s is clamped to [1, PY_EXEC_MAX_TIMEOUT]; on timeout, whatever was produced is still returned.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
codeYes
timeout_sNo

Output Schema

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescription
resultYes

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses return values, input delivery mechanism, absence of shell parsing, working directory, PYTHONPATH prepending, timeout clamping, and partial output on timeout. This is substantial, though it does not mention broader execution sandbox limits or side-effect risks.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three information-dense sentences with no filler. The core purpose is front-loaded, followed by necessary execution details. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 2-parameter execution tool, the description covers return values, input handling, working directory, import path, and timeout behavior. It is mostly complete, though details like available packages or Python version are left to the environment. The output schema also exists to document return format.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It does: 'code' is clarified with verbatim escaping guidance, and 'timeout_s' is explained with clamping range and timeout behavior. It does not restate the default value, but that is already in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The opening sentence states a specific verb and resource: 'Execute Python code and return its stdout, stderr and exit code.' This unambiguously identifies the tool's function. With no sibling tools, differentiation is unnecessary.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear practical guidance: code is fed via STDIN, not shell-parsed, so it should be written as in a .py file. It also explains the working directory and PYTHONPATH behavior. There are no sibling alternatives to contrast against, but the usage context is explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 1 tool updatev0.1.0
    • First observedrun_python

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another tool. Its purpose is explicit and unique.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun snake_case convention. There are no other tool names to create inconsistency.

Tool Count5/5

One tool exactly matches the server's narrow purpose of executing Python code. The count is well-scoped without unnecessary breadth.

Completeness5/5

The tool fully covers the execution domain: it handles stdin, working directory, PYTHONPATH, timeouts, and returns stdout, stderr, and exit code. No obvious gaps exist.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables secure execution of whitelisted shell commands through MCP, with support for stdin input, timeout control, and comprehensive output including stdout, stderr, and execution time.
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides a persistent Python REPL session as a tool for executing code, managing files, installing packages, and initializing projects via the MCP protocol.
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to execute arbitrary Python code securely in a sandboxed environment with resource limits and security constraints via MCP protocol.
    MIT