coda_create_folder
Create a new folder in your Coda workspace, optionally specifying a parent folder and workspace.
Instructions
Create a new folder
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| parentFolderId | No | ||
| workspaceId | No |
Create a new folder in your Coda workspace, optionally specifying a parent folder and workspace.
Create a new folder
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| parentFolderId | No | ||
| workspaceId | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description must carry the full burden. It only states 'Create a new folder' with no disclosure of side effects, required permissions, or behavior (e.g., whether it can be a top-level folder or needs a parent). This is insufficient for a mutation tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short (one sentence), which is concise but lacks necessary details. It does not waste words, but it also does not earn its place fully as it omits critical information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool has 3 parameters (1 required) and no output schema. A creation tool should describe what the folder is created under, the role of optional parameters, and expected behavior. This minimal description is incomplete for effective use by an AI agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0% (tool description does not mention parameters). The description adds no meaning beyond the schema, which itself has descriptions for each parameter. With low coverage, the description should compensate but fails to do so.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action and resource: 'Create a new folder'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like coda_create_doc or coda_create_page by specifying 'folder'. However, it lacks any additional context about scope or constraints.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There are many sibling tools for creating other entities, but no tips on prerequisites, common use cases, or when not to use this folder creation tool.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bluestemso/coda-io-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server