oracle-mcp-lite
Related Servers
Alternatives to oracle-mcp-lite
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Oracle SQL performance diagnostics and AWR analysis, compatible with any MCP client that supports stdio or HTTP transports.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language performance analysis and optimization of AWS Aurora MySQL databases, using AI (Bedrock, Claude) and RAG to generate HTML reports and recommendations.2-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables on-call database diagnostics: it classifies load pressure, traces root causes with hypothesis-evidence-confidence, detects blocking and lock chains, scores health across a dimension tree, and renders deliverable incident reports. Works from symptom text alone with no database connection or history required (Tier0), escalating to snapshot-based and trend-based analysis as observations accumulate.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceUniversal database copilot for diagnostics, operations, and performance analysis via MCP and CLI.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to inspect and query Oracle Forms modules (blocks, triggers, program units, etc.) without Forms Builder, supporting reverse engineering, code review, and modernization.8Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to analyze JVM thread dumps and GC logs, detecting deadlocks, lock contention, and GC pressure, without requiring a JVM runtime.726 npm2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only a single tool there is no possibility of confusion or misselection. The purpose (analyze AWR/ASH reports) is clearly stated and unambiguous.
The lone name awr_analyze follows a clear noun_verb snake_case pattern, though a single data point makes consistency trivially satisfied rather than demonstrated across a set.
A one-tool surface is too thin for a database diagnostics server; everything hinges on the user already having a report file. Typical tuning workflows (connect, list snapshots, fetch report) have no supporting tools.
The analysis itself appears thorough (DB info, waits, top SQL, recommendations), but the lifecycle is a dead end: there is no tool to retrieve or generate an AWR/ASH report from a database, and no follow-up tools for deeper drill-down.