executeCommand
Execute a command in a SiYuan note system by specifying the command type and parameters.
Instructions
执行指定的命令
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| type | Yes | 命令类型 | |
| params | No | 命令参数 |
Execute a command in a SiYuan note system by specifying the command type and parameters.
执行指定的命令
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| type | Yes | 命令类型 | |
| params | No | 命令参数 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description only repeats the tool's function without disclosing any behavioral traits (e.g., destructive potential, permissions, side effects). This is insufficient for an execution tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise but under-specified. It earns its place minimally but lacks useful detail.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, no annotations, and two parameters that are not elaborated, the description is incomplete. It fails to cover expected behavior, command types, or example usage.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and descriptions exist, so baseline is 3. Description does not add additional meaning beyond schema or clarify expected values for 'type' or structure of 'params'.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states it executes a command, which is clear but vague. It does not differentiate from siblings like 'help' or 'queryCommands', nor specify scope or command types.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No prerequisites or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/blueblueeyes/siyuan-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server