track_bonkfun

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the full burden. It only states the purpose but does not disclose behavior such as data source, update frequency, rate limits, or any side effects. The agent cannot infer how the tool operates beyond fetching trending launches.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at 4 words, but this brevity sacrifices essential information. While no wasted words, the lack of detail makes it barely adequate.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, no annotations, and one parameter, the description fails to explain return values, data format, or interpretation of 'trending launches'. The tool is likely functional, but the description leaves the agent guessing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, and the tool description does not mention the 'limit' parameter. The agent receives no context about what the limit controls (e.g., number of results) or how to use it effectively.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Solana meme launcher — trending launches,' which clearly indicates the tool tracks trending launches on a Solana meme platform. It is specific but does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling tool 'track_pumpfun', though the name implies a different platform.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'track_pumpfun' or other tracking tools. The description does not mention any prerequisites, context, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.