Skip to main content
Glama
blizzy78

Task Manager MCP Server

by blizzy78
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Task Manager MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • RTaskmaster MCP

      RagnarPitla
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A task management MCP server for AI-driven development, enabling creation, tracking, and organization of tasks with subtasks, priorities, and dependencies via natural language commands.
      13
      5 npm
      MIT

    • pith

      SiluPanda
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for task management that enables AI agents to read, create, update tasks, and track work sessions, allowing agents and humans to collaborate on the same task board.
      5 npm
      9
      MIT

    • moo-tasks

      shekarsiri
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for agentic task orchestration and management, enabling AI agents to create goals, plan tasks with acceptance criteria, track dependencies, request human input, and provide proof of completion.
      5 npm
      2
      MIT

    • task-mcp

      maxronner
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Taskwarrior that implements agent claim and lease semantics for task management. It enables agents to list, create, and modify tasks while ensuring mutual exclusion through a system where tasks must be claimed before they are updated.
      10
      9 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct, non-overlapping purpose: create_task for creation, current_task for listing in-progress tasks, decompose_task for breaking down complex tasks, task_info for retrieving details, and update_task for modifying task properties. The descriptions clearly differentiate their roles, with no ambiguity about when to use each tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (e.g., create_task, decompose_task, update_task). The naming is predictable and uniform across all five tools, making it easy for an agent to understand and select the appropriate tool.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, this server is well-scoped for a task management domain. The count is appropriate, covering core operations without being overwhelming or too sparse, and each tool serves a clear, necessary function in the workflow.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides strong coverage for task management, including creation, decomposition, status updates, and information retrieval. A minor gap exists in the lack of a delete or archive tool for task lifecycle management, but agents can work around this by using update_task to mark tasks as completed or obsolete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources