No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool targets a distinct artifact or check: order validation, feature audit, rebalance planning, cost conversion, genome validation, sizing explanation, promotion verdict, and portfolio optimization. There is mild thematic overlap in the risk/sizing family (validate_order, explain_sizing, plan_rebalance all touch risk gates), but descriptions make the boundaries clear enough that misselection is unlikely.
Every tool follows a uniform dot-prefixed snake_case convention (warden.<name>). Most are verb_noun (validate_order, audit_features, plan_rebalance, validate_genome, explain_sizing, optimize_portfolio), with a couple noun-first variants (cost_check, promotion_verdict) that remain clearly readable and consistent in style.
Eight tools is well-scoped for a risk/validation gatekeeper domain. Each tool covers a distinct responsibility (order gating, feature audit, rebalance, cost model, genome identity, sizing, promotion, optimization) with no obvious redundancy.
The surface covers the core risk-gating lifecycle from order validation through rebalance planning, cost modeling, sizing, and promotion verdicts, and explicitly documents that it never routes trades (a deliberate boundary, not a gap). Minor gaps exist around state/query operations (e.g., fetching current floors or drift history), but agents can work around them.