Skip to main content
Glama
blink1217
by blink1217

Related Servers

Alternatives to trading-swarm-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first, deterministic, read-only MCP server that audits test suites for false-green tests, tautological assertions, and mock-contract drift, ensuring tests truly validate production code. It provides tools to detect test fidelity issues, verify mock drift, and synthesize strict mock contracts.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools for local code validation with execution evidence, enabling users to run planned checks on projects and receive JSON results that distinguish passing, failing, and incomplete outcomes.
      34 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for natural-language daily stock/ETF strategy backtesting. It provides constrained tools for strategy specification, data validation, queue-based backtests, and verifiable result artifacts.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides read-only MCP tools for market snapshots, position risk, order reconciliation, and daily report previews with deterministic financial calculations, evidence chains, and audit trails.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct risk/validation concern: cost modeling, order validation, feature auditing, genome validation, sizing, and promotion verdicts. The shared warden prefix reinforces domain cohesion without making the tools interchangeable.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are snake_case with a consistent warden. prefix, and most follow a verb_noun pattern like validate_order and audit_features. cost_check and promotion_verdict are minor deviations from the verb-first convention, but the overall style is still predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With six tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose: validating, sizing, auditing, and gating trading swarm decisions. Every tool has a clear role, and none feels like redundant filler.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the core workflow: cost adjustment, order gating, feature provenance, genome identity, sizing logic, and promotion intake. Minor gaps exist around directly inspecting live positions or submitting the emitted audit/cloud jobs, but agents can work around these with input parameters and external follow-up.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues