Sb3 Remove Costume

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description bears the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the removal action but gives no details about side effects, reversibility, validation, or the behavior behind the parenthetical 'proxied'. The 'proxied' hint is opaque and not explained.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and front-loaded, which is structurally efficient. However, it is under-speccified: the unexplained 'proxied' parenthetical and complete absence of parameter or usage context make it feel sparse rather than deliberately concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations and zero parameter documentation, the description is not complete enough. Although an output schema exists, the lack of explanation for target/name, proxy behavior, and side effects leaves significant gaps for an agent deciding how to invoke the tool safely and correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description provides no explanation of the required 'target' and 'name' parameters. The parameter names are somewhat self-evident, but the description does not compensate for the missing schema documentation, leaving an agent to guess their roles and accepted formats.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action, 'Remove a costume,' which clearly identifies the tool's purpose and distinguishes it from sibling tools like sb3_remove_sound and sb3_remove_sprite. However, it adds little beyond the tool name and does not explain the 'proxied' qualifier, so it is clear but not fully enriched.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given about when to use this tool over alternatives such as project_remove_asset or sb3_remove_sound. The description does not mention prerequisites, target types, or any conditions that would help an agent select this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.