Skip to main content
Glama
blasrodri

mcp-truth-check

by blasrodri

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-truth-check

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables verification of AI coding agent self-reports against git diff truth and a deterministic gate, producing pass/regenerate/reject directives to ensure claimed work matches actual changes.
      6
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to verify claims deterministically by computing arithmetic, ratios, and dates and matching statements against provided sources, returning a confidence ladder of certain, source-backed, or unverifiable.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to enforce spec-driven development and verify code before it is marked done, using six tools that catch invented APIs, scan for hallucinated content, check plugin conformance, sandbox-run tests, validate schemas, and record audit evidence.
      771 npm
      8
      PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for verifying AI agent claims vs reality — single-transcript inline grounding-check that flags when an agent's response states facts not in the input context, when its code silently swallows exceptions and substitutes mock data, or when its multi-turn transcript contains contradictions or unverified completion claims. Sub-second, local, free, no API calls.
      4
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides deterministic, verifiable text/code/measurement utilities for AI agents, enabling tasks like unit conversion, citation formatting, diffing, proofreading, readability scoring, and syntax checking with re-executable proof.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no ambiguity. The tool's purpose is clearly defined as truth-checking claims.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The tool name 'verify_turn' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, consistent with itself.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool is borderline. The server's scope is narrow (fact-checking), but a single tool handling all verification aspects seems reasonable yet thin.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool requires pre-recorded command runs for checking 'tests pass', but no tool is provided to record such runs, creating a significant gap in the workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues