Eliminar preset de firma

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It only states the scope requirement but does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether deletion is permanent, cascading effects, or authorization details beyond scope. This is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (one sentence plus requirement), which achieves conciseness but at the expense of completeness. It is front-loaded with the action, but lacks structure and essential details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and only one parameter without explanation, the description is incomplete. It fails to cover what happens after deletion (e.g., if the operation is idempotent, what the response looks like, or any prerequisites beyond scope).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one parameter ('presetId') with no description, and schema coverage is 0%. The description does not explain what 'presetId' is or provide any guidance on its format or where to obtain it. This leaves the agent without necessary context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Elimina' = delete) and the resource ('preset de la biblioteca' / signature preset). It distinguishes well from sibling tools like kairo_delete_document or kairo_delete_studio.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions the required scope 'write', providing basic context. However, it does not specify when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., when to delete a preset vs. update it) or any conditions (e.g., cannot delete if preset is in use).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.