zyta-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to zyta-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying and retrieving legal texts and decisions from French public APIs Légifrance and JudiLibre for legal research.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides access to official French legal databases (Légifrance and JudiLibre) to search and retrieve French legislation, legal codes, case law, and judicial decisions through authenticated APIs.33MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search, retrieve, and analyze South Korean legal documents including statutes, precedents, constitutional decisions, and administrative rulings via the Ministry of Government Legislation Open API. Provides 89 specialized tools with features like legal abbreviation auto-recognition, annex extraction, and complex research chain workflows.MIT

LexAPI MCPofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying EU legal documents, case law, and citation graphs through natural language using the LexAPI.1044 npm3MIT- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceExposes 55 forensic tools over the Model Context Protocol so agents can query Chilean statutes, jurisprudence, administrative dicta and doctrine from official state sources such as BCN, PJUD, CGR and DT, while running locally for confidential casework. It also supports citation-validated drafting, deadline and docket monitoring, judgment deconstruction, OCR dossier compilation and legal knowledge-graph analysis for civil-law practice, teaching and research.751,482 PyPI5Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to Brazilian judicial data via DataJud CNJ, LexML, and local corpus, enabling process consultation, legal research, and document generation with Visual Law.262MIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Most tools target distinct resources and actions. However, 'zyta_jurisprudencia_search' and 'zyta_minerva_buscar_fallos' both search for legal rulings, causing slight overlap. Descriptions help clarify differences, but some ambiguity remains.
Naming is inconsistent: mixes English ('search', 'list', 'get') and Spanish ('buscar', 'registrar'), with varying structures (e.g., 'expediente_get' vs 'expedientes_list', and 'whoami' as an outlier). No consistent verb_noun pattern.
With 14 tools, the count is well-scoped for a legal MCP server. It covers authentication, judicial processes, jurisprudencia, Minerva, trademarks, and user info without feeling excessive or thin.
The tool set covers core workflows: auth, judicial expedient management, jurisprudencia search, Minerva consultation, trademarks, and user info. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no update/delete for expedients, no trademark management beyond search), but they are not critical.