zyta_expedientes_alertas_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states the action and endpoint, lacking details on idempotency, auth requirements, pagination behavior, or error conditions (e.g., missing expedienteId).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise: one line with two sentences. It is front-loaded with the key action and resource. While minimal, it contains no fluff and is appropriate for a simple list tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 6 parameters, 1 required, and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain return format, filtering behavior, or pagination beyond what the schema hints. A more complete description would mention the response structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 67% (4 of 6 parameters have descriptions), which is moderate. The tool description adds no parameter information beyond the schema. Two parameters (estado, prioridad) lack descriptions, and the description does not compensate for them.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it lists alarms for an expediente, using a specific verb 'Lista' and resource 'alarmas de un expediente'. It includes the HTTP method and endpoint. Siblings include create, delete, update tools, making this distinct.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for listing alarms of an expediente, but provides no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. Sibling tools are named but not referenced as alternatives. The context of CRUD siblings makes usage clear by implication.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.