Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Xbitto MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes native OnlyFans and Fansly access as MCP tools, letting agents read fans, messages, media, earnings, posts, transactions and subscribers across connected creators, with opt-in outbound writes. It also provides CRM tags, smart links, webhooks and bulk exports through a single API key.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables agents to manage a creator business on the vips platform, including posting content, managing subscriptions, handling payments, and going live. Provides tools for earnings, analytics, and subscriber management via MCP tools.
      53 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to discover current fal.ai model schemas and pricing, submit only approved generation batches, manage assets, collections, tags, characters, and CDN access settings, and use isolated private account profiles through shared validated tools.
      66
      100 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI apps to browse models, estimate costs, generate and upscale images or videos, retrieve generations, and manage library references, uploads, folders, and account details, with optional uploading of local files from a configured directory.
      1,857 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to turn long-form episodes into Shorts, thumbnails, show notes and a podcast RSS feed, then publish them to the creator's own YouTube channel using OAuth-based, credential-free access. It exposes a deny-by-default set of read, create and step-up-approved publish tools so agents can run a creator's clip pipeline end to end without holding API keys or Google credentials.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: links, vault items, paywalls, pool items, uploads, orders, and payments are clearly separated. Minor potential overlap between get_upload_job and get_vault_item is resolved by their descriptions, which distinguish upload progress from item state.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: list_vault, get_link, create_video, add_episodes, confirm_payment, etc. The only notable deviation is whoami, which breaks the convention but remains clear.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 19 tools, the set is slightly above the typical 3–15 range, but the platform covers multiple resource types and workflows. Each tool has a clear, distinct role, so the count is reasonable rather than bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    Core lifecycle operations are covered: content creation for galleries/videos/series, link and paywall setup, pool management, upload tracking, and order/payment decisions. Some gaps exist around deleting or editing links and vault items, but agents can work around these limitations for most workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues