gossipcatofficial
A
licenseNot graded
qualityA
maintenanceEnables multi-agent code review with cross-verification of findings against source code, catching hallucinations and improving agent accuracy over time.
75 npm
41
MIT
gpt-cross-validator
by black940514
Related Servers
Alternatives to gpt-cross-validator
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceUses Claude as an independent second-model reviewer inside Codex, performing reviews on disposable Git snapshots with structured findings.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to leverage OpenAI models for expert code review, deep architecture analysis, and security audits, with automatic markdown report generation.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to delegate tasks to OpenAI's Codex CLI (GPT-5.4) with structured execution traces, parallel execution, session persistence, and adversarial code review.15MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables structured multi-model AI planning sessions across multiple CLI coding tools, orchestrating independent planning, peer review, and final synthesis.1613 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables multi-agent AI collaboration by connecting Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, and Google Antigravity, providing cross-model code reviews, independent second opinions, and autonomous validation through MCP tools.1-
TDQS
A3.7/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The two tools have clearly distinct scopes: one critiques plans/designs while the other reviews code quality. Despite both using Gemini, the target artifact is unambiguously different, so an agent can easily select the appropriate tool.
Naming Consistency5/5
Both tools follow the consistent `<provider>_<verb>` pattern (gemini_critique, gemini_review), using lowercase and underscores. The naming style is uniform and predictable.
Tool Count3/5
With only two tools, the server is minimal but each tool serves a specific validation type. While it doesn't reach the typical 3-15 range, the narrow scope of cross-validation makes the count borderline acceptable.
Completeness5/5
The server covers the two main artifact types (plans/designs and code) that would need independent validation. No additional validation types are implied by the server's purpose, so the surface is fully sufficient.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues