Skip to main content
Glama
bksampadi

SignalRank MCP

by bksampadi

Related Servers

Alternatives to SignalRank MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agent tools like Claude Code and GitHub Copilot to perform knowledge retrieval using hybrid search (BM25 + dense) with reranking, via MCP protocol.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to query a modular RAG knowledge hub with hybrid dense/sparse retrieval, reranking, multimodal image support, and traceable observability, all through natural language tools.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and MCP clients to combine and rerank results from multiple search or retrieval sources using Reciprocal Rank Fusion and hybrid rank fusion scoring. It exposes deterministic fusion and reranking execution over MCP with structured JSON output.
      7
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP host to search and answer over your own documents with hybrid BM25+dense retrieval, cross-encoder reranking, and grounded, cited responses that refuse when no evidence is found.
      5
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible clients to retrieve relevant document chunks and fact-check generated answers against context, classifying them as fully supported, partially supported, or unsupported.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no risk of selecting between overlapping operations. The single 'search' tool has a clear, singular purpose.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The tool name 'search' is a clear, conventional verb, but with only one tool there is no broader verb_noun or convention pattern to evaluate. No inconsistency is present, though the naming style cannot be fully assessed.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single search tool forms a thin but functionally valid server for ranked-evidence lookup. It is at the low end of acceptable scope and may leave agents wanting supplementary operations.

    Completeness3/5

    The search operation covers the core retrieval use case, but the one-tool surface offers no way to fetch evidence by ID, filter results independently, or inspect sources. Secondary workflows may therefore dead-end.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues