simple-support-system-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to simple-support-system-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for the Ticksy support ticket API, enabling AI agents to read and write support tickets.163 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for SolarWinds Service Desk (SWSD/Samanage) enabling reading and modifying tickets, comments, knowledge-base articles, and more via each user's own API token.37280 npm4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for structured Laravel project planning. Scans projects, creates tickets, and exports as JSON.38 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for drupal.org's public REST API. Enables querying projects, issues, comments, and user information on drupal.org.7 npmGPL 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server exposing the internal Ticket API to MCP clients, built with FastMCP's OpenAPI integration.2-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for task/ticket management with dependency tracking, supporting CRUD operations, status management, project filtering, and automatic data migrations.8 npm1-
TDQS
Scored across 23 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource+action across tickets, comments, projects, and attachments, and descriptions clarify the boundaries (e.g., reply_to_ticket creates a comment while update_comment edits it, upload_attachment vs add_ticket_attachments vs delete_attachment are cleanly separated). An agent can reliably pick the right tool without guessing.
Consistent snake_case verb-first naming throughout: list_/get_/create_/update_/delete_ for resources, plus clear action verbs like set_ticket_state, reply_to_ticket, approve_ticket. The only deviations (list_ticket_comments, add_ticket_attachments) follow the same pattern.
23 tools is on the heavier side, but the surface spans four resources (tickets, comments, projects, attachments) each needing full lifecycle plus moderation and state handling, so nearly every tool earns its place. Slightly over the comfortable range but justified by scope.
Strong coverage: full CRUD for tickets and projects, comment management with moderation, attachment upload/link/download/delete lifecycle, and state transitions. Minor gaps remain, such as no way to list users to resolve assigneeUserId and no standalone create_comment (covered by reply_to_ticket).