get_webhook_rule
Retrieve a specific webhook rule by its ID to inspect its configuration and settings.
Instructions
Get one webhook rule by id. Read-only.
GET /webhook_rules/{id}
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| rule_id | Yes |
Retrieve a specific webhook rule by its ID to inspect its configuration and settings.
Get one webhook rule by id. Read-only.
GET /webhook_rules/{id}
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| rule_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description declares 'Read-only', but with no annotations provided, it carries the full burden. However, it does not disclose authorization needs or rate limits, which are relevant for a read operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise (two lines) and front-loaded with the action. However, it would benefit from including parameter details without becoming overly verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema is provided, and the description does not explain the return value. Combined with missing parameter semantics, the description is incomplete for an agent to fully understand the tool's behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The sole parameter 'rule_id' has no description in the schema or the tool description. With 0% schema coverage, the agent has no semantic understanding of what the parameter expects.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Get one webhook rule by id' and specifies it's read-only, which differentiates it from sibling tools like list_webhook_rules, create_webhook_rule, etc.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., list_webhook_rules for fetching all rules). The description does not mention prerequisites or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bitterdev/dropscan-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server