b24_products_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description only says 'Updates a product' without disclosing behavior such as whether it performs partial updates, side effects, idempotency, or authorization needs. Given the absence of annotations, the description should provide more behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence, which is concise and front-loaded. However, it sacrifices completeness for brevity, missing important details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of having 3 parameters (including a nested fields object), no output schema, and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It fails to explain the structure of 'fields', the purpose of 'webhook_url', return values, or error conditions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 33% (only 'fields' has a description). The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides for parameters 'id' and 'webhook_url'. It does not compensate for the lack of schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Updates a product in the catalog' clearly states the action (update) and resource (product in catalog). The verb 'update' distinguishes it from sibling tools like b24_products_create (create) or b24_products_get (get). However, it does not explicitly differentiate from similar tools like b24_products_sections.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., b24_products_create for new products, b24_products_get for retrieval). Lacks prerequisites, context for when not to use, or mention of required permissions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.