Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to AutoCAD MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to drive AutoCAD 2024+ and AutoCAD LT through live COM and AutoLISP engines, with support for headless DXF processing, ISO GD&T, P&ID drafting, and Rhino.Inside Grasshopper battery workflows.
      162
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language automation of AutoCAD for drawing, editing, annotating, and exporting, as well as headless DXF generation without AutoCAD, through Model Context Protocol.
      8
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables architects to control AutoCAD 2021-2026 on macOS and Windows through natural language, allowing drawing and editing of architectural plans, checking compliance with standards, and generating construction documents.
      15
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Natural-language MCP bridge for AutoCAD 2024. Enables users to inspect and edit DWG drawings, manage layers, entities, layouts, styles, and system variables; draw 2D geometry and 3D solids; perform measurements and transactional edits; and export to DWG, STL, PDF, DWF, SVG, or raster formats through a local named-pipe connection.
      17
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, and the descriptions explicitly disambiguate the three batch-write tools (draw for raw geometry, build_structure for architectural elements, place_blocks for symbols) and the three read tools (get_drawing_info, query_entities, measure). The main residual overlap is among the write/creation tools, which an agent must read carefully to pick correctly, but the guidance is strong enough to avoid misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names follow a mostly predictable verb_noun pattern (get_drawing_info, query_entities, set_entity_color, delete_entities, build_structure, place_blocks, undo_last_batch, run_cad_command). A few deviate with single bare verbs (draw, measure) or verb_noun phrasing that doesn't fit the resource-action mold (render_view, check_plan), but the overall convention is readable and consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is well-scoped for a CAD server spanning read, write, modify, validate, and render operations. Each tool earns its place, and related actions are consolidated into batches or single multi-mode tools (measure) rather than exploding the count.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle well: document inspection, entity querying, measurement, rendering, batch creation at three abstraction levels, color editing, deletion, undo, and validation via check_plan. The notable gap is direct transformation of existing entities (move/rotate/scale/copy), which is only reachable through the limited native run_cad_command whitelist or full delete-and-redraw.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues