Skip to main content
Glama
bishnubista

Vulnerable Notes MCP Server

by bishnubista

Related Servers

Alternatives to Vulnerable Notes MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A vulnerable-by-design MCP server pair (NotesServer and VaultServer) for testing MCP security tools, featuring confused-deputy, prompt injection, and authorization bypass scenarios.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A learning-oriented MCP server for managing notes, providing tools to create, list, get, update, delete, and search notes, along with resources and prompt templates.
      7 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for a personal notes/knowledge base that enables AI assistants to create, search, and retrieve notes using natural language. It exposes tools like create_note and search_notes, resources for each note, and a summarize_tag prompt.
      6
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A learning-focused MCP server that demonstrates core MCP concepts through a simple notepad application, enabling users to create, update, delete, and search notes while exploring tools, resources, and prompts functionality.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A working MCP server template for notes management (add, get, search, delete) with in-memory store, demonstrating tools, resources, and prompts for easy forking and customization.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between the three export tools (export_backup, export_to_cloud, export_to_json) which could cause confusion about which to use for backup vs. data transfer. The search tools (search_advanced, search_by_date, search_notes) are well-differentiated by their specific functions.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming is mixed: most tools use a verb_noun pattern (e.g., notes_create, notes_delete), but export_backup and export_to_cloud deviate with a verb_preposition_noun style. Additionally, search_advanced and search_by_date lack a consistent prefix like 'notes_' seen in other tools, creating minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the count is well-suited for a notes management server. It covers core operations (create, read, delete), advanced features (search, summarization), and utilities (export, cleanup), without being overwhelming or too sparse for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset provides good coverage for notes management, including CRUD operations, search, summarization, and export. A minor gap is the lack of an update tool for modifying existing notes, which agents might need to work around by deleting and recreating notes.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues