Vulnerable Notes MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Vulnerable Notes MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA vulnerable-by-design MCP server pair (NotesServer and VaultServer) for testing MCP security tools, featuring confused-deputy, prompt injection, and authorization bypass scenarios.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA learning-oriented MCP server for managing notes, providing tools to create, list, get, update, delete, and search notes, along with resources and prompt templates.7 npm-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for a personal notes/knowledge base that enables AI assistants to create, search, and retrieve notes using natural language. It exposes tools like create_note and search_notes, resources for each note, and a summarize_tag prompt.6MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA learning-focused MCP server that demonstrates core MCP concepts through a simple notepad application, enabling users to create, update, delete, and search notes while exploring tools, resources, and prompts functionality.4-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA simple note-taking MCP server for recording and managing notes with AI models.47 npm37GPL 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA working MCP server template for notes management (add, get, search, delete) with in-memory store, demonstrating tools, resources, and prompts for easy forking and customization.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between the three export tools (export_backup, export_to_cloud, export_to_json) which could cause confusion about which to use for backup vs. data transfer. The search tools (search_advanced, search_by_date, search_notes) are well-differentiated by their specific functions.
The naming is mixed: most tools use a verb_noun pattern (e.g., notes_create, notes_delete), but export_backup and export_to_cloud deviate with a verb_preposition_noun style. Additionally, search_advanced and search_by_date lack a consistent prefix like 'notes_' seen in other tools, creating minor inconsistency.
With 11 tools, the count is well-suited for a notes management server. It covers core operations (create, read, delete), advanced features (search, summarization), and utilities (export, cleanup), without being overwhelming or too sparse for the domain.
The toolset provides good coverage for notes management, including CRUD operations, search, summarization, and export. A minor gap is the lack of an update tool for modifying existing notes, which agents might need to work around by deleting and recreating notes.