Skip to main content
Glama
biplatform-demo

BI Portal Report Builder MCP Server

by biplatform-demo
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to BI Portal Report Builder MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • pbix-mcp

      d0nk3yhm
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for creating, editing, and evaluating Power BI (.pbix/.pbit) files without Power BI Desktop. Supports 101 tools including report creation, data sources, DAX measures, and file manipulation.
      5,681 PyPI
      21
      MIT

    • powerbi-mcp-server

      Divyansh-dev12
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects Claude and other MCP clients to Microsoft Power BI via its REST API using a Service Principal, enabling natural language queries to list workspaces, run DAX queries, refresh datasets, and explore reports.
      7
      -

    • powerbi-mcp-proxy

      AviHack
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A self-hosted MCP server that proxies MCP clients to Power BI, using your own Entra tenant and Azure subscription. It enables DAX queries, workspace listing, and dataset management while preserving user-specific row-level security.
      2
      MIT

    • powerbi-plus

      rajivdatta
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for building and inspecting Power BI report visuals by editing PBIR files on disk, enabling page, chart, slicer, and layout management.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool occupies a distinct role in the dataset-query-draft-submit-view pipeline. The two view tools are clearly separated by dashboard_kind, and list_datasets vs run_explore_query are unambiguous as metadata listing vs live querying.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent lowercase snake_case verb-first pattern (list_, run_, create_, update_, get_, submit_, view_). The compound noun suffixes for the two dashboard viewers are descriptive and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools cover the core report-builder workflow without redundancy or bloat. Each tool maps to a meaningful step in the process, making the set well-scoped for its domain.

    Completeness3/5

    The core workflow is covered: discover datasets, preview queries, create/update/fetch/submit reports, and view saved results. However, there is no list_reports tool to enumerate existing drafts or reports, and no delete/discard operation, which leaves tangible lifecycle gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources